Montreal herald and daily commercial gazette, 26 octobre 1869, mardi 26 octobre 1869

[" U r* INSURANCE.msueÂict [GMPiun.SECURITY Should be the First Consideratioh in Insurance Transactions.The lUrectors of the HOYAh INSUri-ANCE COMPANY have the pleasure oi supplying the following Information to the public, as evidence of the ample'security they afl'oid to their assurers :\u2014 THE CAPITAL of the Company, available for the purpose of meeting any unusual calamity happening to the Assured, is TWO MISSIONS STEMXIXCL The amount, actually paid up is .£288,105.This, with the Accumulated Funds in hand, makes the invested resources of the Company upwards of ONE Ml El.I ON !8iX HUNDRED THOUSAND POUNDS, which amount is invested as follows:\u2014 I.INVESTED FUNDS OF THE ROY AD INSURANCE CUMPAN 1, 30th June, 1869.Real Property owned by the; Company.£¦*2$,571 u Mortgages on Freehold Property .33,500 0 £30,000 Reduced 3 per Cent Consols .28,085\t1 India Government 5 per Cent Debentures.___ 100,000\t0 English Railway Debenture Bonds.59,090\t17 First Class English Railway Preference and Guaranteed Stocks.\u2019.335,476 11 11 Doans to Local Authorities of various Towns in Gt.Britain, \u2022who have obtained the sanction of the Secretary of State to borrow the\tamounts .\t145,560\t12\tC Bonds of the Mersey Docks and Harbour Board .\t62,311 11 8 Bonds of the British and Irish Magnetic Telegraph\tCo.\t10,000\t0\t( Bonds of the Liverpool Corporation .5,160\t0\t0 United States Government Stock* .101,330 7 10 Canada Bonds and Canada Do- m i n i on S foe k.3 !, it G 11 G Short Loans on first-class English Dividend-paying Stocks with margins, from' 20 to 50 per Cent on market values.\t477,195 0 0 Loans on Security of f ile Poli-1 ici es .63,938 8 5 £1,672,356 16 11 The above is a complete list of the Investments of the Company at the date specified, in addition to which the funds are still further increased, by amounts constantly varying, at different periods, in the bands ofthe Bankers and the Company\u2019s Agents.At 51st.Dec., 1868, these stood at.£168,089 2 0 For the satisfaction of the public, the whole of the Securities belonging to the Company are annually submitted to the careful scrutiny of two independent Auditors, and the following is an Extract from their Report to the last Annual Meeting:\u2014 \u201cThe whole of your Books have been Au.dited\u2014every Document, every Account, every Voucher, your Bank-Book, and every Security\u2014all have been most carefully kept, and there is not one doubtful Security in the whole.\u201d The Aeeiiîiïiïlsut'joïss of Site ï.fîe Sfrejsat\u2019SmeisS, After payment of Losses, Annuities and Ex-penses of every description, have been as ollows Funds in Hand at the last Quinquennial Valuation, 31st Dec., 1861.Added to 31st December, 18*' \").\u201c\t\u201c\t\u201c\tI860.\u201c\t\u201c\t\u201c\t1867.\u201c\t\u201c\t\u201c\t1868.Total Accumulation ofthe Life Department, on 31st Dec., 1868, exclusive oi Shareholders\u2019- Capital.£1,1 The Directors also think it desirable to state that The Kssssssess ofthe ISorsil ïuis ssevc-6\u2019 hceis smasslgasssatert with tlsatofaiay oilier ifoM-l>asiy, ANT) THAT THE ï.iatoiïîty of sis SharehaMes\u2019S is Unlimited, H.L.RÔÜTH.Agent.is 1m 243 £021,434 15 5 1( 3,146 7 .3 124,165 7 5 128,583 5 It) 144,945 12 2 12,275 8 1 October 13.INSHRAHCE COMPANY, HRE au! MFE.Capital, -\t-\t- Annual Income over - - £2,000,000 Stg.- 800,000 \u2018 Accumulated Funds Invested, 1,500,000 ** LARGE EOEGSEsTeOUAL to 2 PER CENT- PER ANNUM./.literal settlement of claims and security to Assured ALL FEES PAID BY THE COMPANY.W.E.Scott, Esq., M.D., Medical Examiner.INSURANCES AGAINST FIRE, on al descriptions of property, taken at moderate rates.ALFRED PERRY, Inspector.H.!.ROtJTU, AGENT, iflü August 13.The Liverpool & London & Globe lNSURANCE_COMPm.CAPITAL.810,000,000 vested Funds,.816,271,075 ocial Reserve for payment of Lifo Claims.,.89,282,468 DIRECTORS in CANADA.T.\tB.Andekson, Esq., Chairman, (Presi- dent Bank of Montreal.) Henry Starnes, Esq.Deputy-Chairman, (Manager Ontario Bank.) E.\tH.King, Esq., (General Manager Bank of Montreal.) Henry Chapman, Esq., Merchant.Thomas Cramp, Esq., Merchant.U.\tF.C.Smith, Resident Secretary.F.\tA.Basl, Hamilton, C.W., j inspectors JAMES SPIER, Montreal, \\ inspectors.Frederick Griffin, Esq., Q,.C., Standing Counsel.Fire ïnssisranee à Life Assurance POLICIES > Issued at Moderate Rates G.F.C.SMITH, Resident Secretary Montreal.January\t15 sSSSs VOL.LXI._ INSURANCE.A COMPLETE LIFE POLICY.TiA > YALT., INSURANCE COMPANY.Important Improvement in Ufa Assurance.A new system has been adopted by this Company, by which Assurers will secure the following undoubted advantages:\u2014 1st.No Policy effected under this system can be entiiely/m;/V/W.by the non-payment of the Premiums; consequently, no Policyholder will lose the benefit of the Premiums lie has paid if he become unable to continue his pay monts.jj&2nd.The Assured can calculate for himself the maximum amount of Premium that can possibly be payable under his Policy.3rd.The Assured will be relieved from the necessity of paying Premiums during old age, when falling health may compel him to retire from business and curtail his expenditure.4th.The Assured has the option, at any time, of surrendering his Policy, and obtaining in lieu another for a certain guaranteed amount, in proportion to the number of Premiums paid, -which will be free from the payment of any further ordinary Premium.EXPLANATION OF THE TABLES.By referring to Table 1 it will be found t hat at Age 25 next birthday a person can insu re for £190, payable at Death, for five annual payments of £8 3s.lOd.The total amount, therefore, he wifi have to pay will be £40 19s.2d.If at the end (let it be supposed) of the third year he wishes to discontinue his payments, he will receive a \u201cPaid-up Policy\u201d for three-fifths of the £100, or £00.Or, by Table IV.his payments would be 20 annual Premiums of £2 17s.2d., and at the end of the third year, should he then cease payment of the Premiums stipulated, his \u201cPaid-up Policy\u201d would be three-twentieths or £15.Table 1.\u2014Without Participation in Profits.Premiums limited to FIVE Annual Payments.Should the Assured wish to discontinue the payment of Premiums before the FIVE stipulated have been discharged, he will be entitled to receive, in lieu of his original Policy,-a \u201cPaid-up Policy\u201d for as many FIFTHS of the sum first assured as there shall have been full Annual Premiums paid.Age.\tAnnual\tPremium.\t\tAge.\tAnnual Premium\t\t 15\t£6\t15\t2\t38\t£10\t6\t10 16\t6\t18\t0\t3)\t10\t10\t7 17\t7\t0\t10\t40\t10\t14\t(i 18\t7\t3\t8\t41\t10\t18\t5 19\t7\t6\t7\t42\t11\t2\t5 20\t7\t9\t6\t43\t11\t6\t8 2:\t7\t12\t4\t44\t11\t11\t2 22\t7\t15\t0\t45\t11\t14\t10 23\t7\t17\t10\t46\t12\t0\t7 21\t8\t0\t10\t47\t12\t5\t6 25\t8\t3\t10\t48\t12\t10\t5 S6\t8\t7\t0\t43\t12\t15\t4 27\t8\t10\t3\t50\t13\t0\t3 28\t8\t13\t7\t51\t13\t5\t5 2!)\t8\t16\t10\t52\t13\t11)\t8 30\t9\t0\t0\t53\t13\t16\t0 31\t9\t3\t3\t51\t14\t1\t5 32\t9\t6\t6\t55\t14\t7\t0 33\t9\t9\t9\t56\t14\tl.i\t9 34\t9\t¦>3\t0\t57\t14\t18\t10 35\t9\t16\t4\t58\t15\t5\t;{ 36\t9\t19\t9\t59\t15\t12\t0 37\t10\t3\t3\t60\t15\t19\t0 Table II.\u2014Without Participation in Profits.Premiums limited to TEN Annual Payments.Should the Assured wish to discontinue the payment of Premiums before the TEN stipulated have been discharged, he will be entitled to receive, in lieu of his original Policy, a \u201c Paid-up Policy \u201d for as many TENTHS of the sum first assured as there shall have been full Annual Premiums paid.I Age.^Annual Premium.\t\t\t\tAge.\tAnnual\tPremium.\t 15\t£3\t15\t6\t68\t£5\t17\t0 16\t3\t17\t2\t:;*>\t5\t19\t2 17\t:i\t18\t10\t\u202210\t6\tJ\t5 18\t4\t0\t\t41\t6\t3\t9 19 *\t4\t2\t\t\u202212\t6\t6\t2 \t4\t.8\t11\t43\t6\t8\t9 21\t4\t5\t6\t44\t6\t11\t6 22\t4\t7\t2\t45\t(i\t14\t4 28\t4\t8\t9\t46\t6\t17\t4 24\t4\t10\t6\t47\t7\t0\t5 25\t4\tJ2\t3\t48\t7\t3\t6 26\t4\t14\t0\t49\t7\t6\t8 27\t4\t15\t10\t50\t7\t9\tIt 28\t4\t17\t8\t51\t7\ti.O\t2 29\t4\t19\t7\t52\t7\t16\t9 30\t5\t1\t6\t53\t8\t0\t5 31\t5\t3\t5\t54\t8\t4\t0 32\t5\t5\t4\t! 55\t8\t7\t8 33\t5\t7\t2\t.56\t8\til\t8 34\tr>\t9\t0\t! 57\t8\t16\t0 35\t5\t11\t0\ti 68\t9\t0\t8 \u2018 36\t5\t13\t0\t5!)\t9\t5\t10 37\t5\t15\t0\ti «0\t9\t11\t6 Table HI.\u2014Without Participation in Profits Premiums limited to FIFTEEN Annual Payments.Should the Assured wish to discontinue the payment of Premiums before the FIFTEEN stipulated have been discharged, he will be entitled to receive, in lieu of his original policy, a \u201cPaid-up Policy\u201d for as many FIFTEENTHS of the sum first assured as there shall have been full Annual Premiums paid.Age.\tAnnua l Premium.|\t\t\tAge.\\Annual\t\tPremium.\t 15\t£2\t16\t5\t38\t£4\t8\t0 16\t2\t17\t6\t39\t4\t9\t9 17\t2\t18\t8\t40\t4\t11\t6 18\t3\t0\t0\t41\t4\t18\t3 10\t3\t1\t3\t42\t4\t15\t2 20\t3\t2\t0\t43\t4\t17\t4 21\t3\t3\t9\t44\t4\t10\t6 22\t3\t5\t0\t45\t5\t1\t9 23\t3\t6\t4\t46\t5\t4\t2 24\t3\t7\t8\t47\t5\t6\t8 25\t3\t9\t0\t48\t5\t9\t3 26\t8\t10\t\u20224\t49\t5\t12\t0 27\t3\t1L\t8\t50\t5\t14\t11 28\t3\t13\t0\t51\t5\t18\t0 29\t3\t14\t6\t52\t6\t1\t2 30\t3\t]5\t11\t53\t6\t4\t5 31\t3\t17\t4\t5i\t6\t7\t10 32\t3\t18\t9\t55\t6\t11\t5 33\t4\t0\t2\t50\t6\t15\t2 84\t4\t1\t8\t57\t6\t19\t2 85\t4\t3\t2\t58\t7\t3\t5 36\t4\t4\t8\t59\t7\t7\t10 37\t4\t6\t3\t60\t7\t12\t5 Table IV.\u2014Without Participation in Profits.Premiums limited to TWENTY Annual Payments.Should the Assured wish to discontinue the payment of Premiums before the Twenty stipulated have been discharged, he will be entitled to receive, in lieu of bis original policy, a \u201c Paid-up Policy \u201d for as many TWENTIETHS of the s'un first assured as there shall have been full Annual Premiums paid The Ciikeiis5 Insarunee Company OP CAÎL\u2019JA.Auehorized Capital,.\t.$2,000,000 Subscribed Capital,.$1,000,000 IDinector**?: HUGH ALLAN, President.EDWIN ATWATER, C.J.BRYDGES, GEORGE STEPHEN, Il Y.LYMAN, ADOLPHE ROY,\tN.8.CORSE.Life and Guramtee Department, Head Office : 71 Great St.James Street This Company is prepared to transact every description of JjIFE assurance.Also 1,0 grant Bonds of * FIDELITY GUARANTEE For Employes in positions f Trust.Prospectuses can be obtained at the Office n Montreal, or through any of the Company\u2019s Agents.EDWARD RAWLINGS, Manager, February 18.\t41 Age.\tAnnual Premium.\t\t\tAge.\tAnnual\tPremium.\t 15\t£2\t6\t5\t38\t£3\t13\t9 16\t2\t7\t5\t89\t8\t15\t3 17\t2\t8\t6\t40\t3\t16\t10 18\t2\t9\t6\t41\t8\t18\t6 19\t2\t10\t6\t42\t4\t0\t3 20\to\t11\t8\t43\t4\t2\t2 21\t2\t12\t9\t44\t4\t4\t2 22\t2\t13\tin\t45\t4\t6\t4 23\t2\t14\t11\t46\t4\t8\t7 21\t2\t16\t0\t47\t4\t10\t10 25\t2\t17\t2\t-18\t4\t13\t3 26\t.2\t18\t4\t49\t4\t15\t10 27\t2\t10\t6\t50\t4\t18\t7 28\t3\tÜ\t8\t51\t5\tI\t5 29\t3\t1\t10\t52\t5\t4\t4 30\t3\t3\t0\t53\t5\t7\t5 31\t3\t4\t3\t54\t5\tin\t8 32\t3\t5\t6\t55\t5\t14\t2 33\t3\t6\t9\t56\t5\t18\t0 34\t3\t8\t0\t57\t6\t2\t0- 35\t3\t9\t5\t58\t6\t6\t3 ' 36\t3\t10\t10\t59\tr>\t10\t0 37\t3\t12\t3\t60\t1 6\t15\t6 AND DAILY COMMERCIAL GAZETTE MONTREAL.TUESDAY MORNING, OCTOBER 26, 1869.INSURANCE.Will ÏSSI611 TO Security.CITIZENS\u2019 INSURANCE are prepared to issue BONDS of Guarantee on behalf of OFFICIAL ASSIGNEES.Those giving the Guarantee of this Company as INTERIM ASSIGNEES will be favourably treated with in regard to subsequent Bonds that may be required for in dividual Estates.K1 > W A RD R A W L1NG S, Manager.October 15,\t246 FOR SALE.perams Gunpowder, Imperial, Hyson, Young Hysons and Twanliay, Uncolored Japans, Congou & Souchong INSOLVENT NOTICES.flSQLÏErif_âCTl\"rr869.LOUIS OLYMPE TURGEON, of the City and District of Montreal, Trader, Plaintif' ; vs.ANTOINE D ARCHE and DAVID DARCHE both Merchants, copartners, of the Parish of Chambly, in the District of Montreal, and there carrying on business together as such under the name and firm of A.DARCHE & FRERE.Defendants.A Writ of Attachment has issued in this cause.T.BOUTHTLLIER, Sheriff, Montreal, 21stOctober, 1869.\t253 BUCHAUAU, LEOKIE & 00- October 6 237 100 IMPOTS ill, Hhds.ex \u201c Ehoda,\u201d from loUenk.in.INSOLVENT 1ÇT OF 1869.In the matter of MCCULLOCH, JACK & CO., Insolvents.A Dividend Sheet, lias been prepared, subject to objection, until the EIGHTH day NOVEMBER next, after which Dividend will be paid.JAMES COURT, Assignee.Montreal, 29th October, 1869.\tdu 253 INSOLVENT ACT OF 1869.In the Matter of JOHN PENNER, of Montreal, an Insolvent.I, the undersigned, Andrew B, Stewart of the City of Montreal, have been appointed Assignee in this Matter.Creditors are requested tofyle their claims before me within one month.A.B.STEWART, Assignee.Montreal, 19th October, 1869.du 25'j j INSOLVENT _ACT OF « J In the Matter of Robert Bryson Rutjeter-! ford, of Montreal, Merchant Tailor, and as having been a Partner in the late Firm of RUTHERFORD & BROTHER, Merchant Tailors there, an Insolvent.BUCUÀIIÂ1I, LEOKIE & CO.October 0.\t238 .BRANDY.\u201c James Hennessy\u2019s\u201d OOGKNAAC Hhds, Qr-cks, Octaves and Cases 1868, AND OLDER VINTAGES.The Insolvent has made an assignment of his Estate to me, and the Creditors are notified to meet at the place of business of the Insolvent, 134 Great St.James Street, on THURSDAY, the FOURTH, day of NOVEMBER, at ELEVEN o\u2019clock Forenoon, to receive statement of his affairs and to appoint an Assignee.DAVID J.CRAIG, Interim Assignee.October 19.\tdu 249 J 1 CHOICE Minis amt oi- ®UTY FREE, AT Those Convenient and Central 'Warehouses IN REAR OF No.17 & 19 St.Sacrament Street, ON THE MOST BIBERAB TERMS.Coplanil, PIplÉr I Co., 19 ST.SAOEAMENT STREET,.September 2a.WILLIAM BEAUCHAMP, Fashionable Hair Dresser.WIGS and TOUPPES constantly on hand or made t.o order.Mr.B., better known as tbe \u201cProfessor,\u2019 has had 27 years experience at the.business.Guarantees to sive the best of satisfaction to those requiring his services.Please copy the address- 641 & 643 CRAIG STREET.October 9._\t241 THE GREAT FEMALE REMEDY\" Jol) Moses\u2019 Periodical Pills, This invaluable medicine is unfailing in the cure ol all those painful and dangerous diseases to which the female constitution is subject, it removes ail obstructions, from whatever cause.TO MARRIED LADIES it is particularly suited.It will in a short time bring on the monthly period with regularity, and, although very poweiful, contains nothing hurtful to the constitution.In ail cases of Nervous and Spinal Affections, Pains in the Rack and Limbs, Fatigue on slight exertion, Palpitation of the Heart, Hysterics and Whites, it will effect a cure when all other means 5>ave failed.The pamphlet around each package has full directions and advice, or will be sent free to all writing for it, sealed from observation.JOB MOSES, New York, Sole Proprietor.$1.00 and 19} cents for postage, enclosed to Northrop*Lyman, Newcastle, Ont.,general agents fo- the Dominion, will insure a bottle containing over 50 pills, by return mail.For Sale by Northrop & Lyman, Newcastle, General Agents for Canada.Sold by all the Druggists in Montreal, and medicine dealers everywhere.August 31.\t(DSW ly.\"0)\t207 EASE TOILET ARTICLES.tfST- BOGLE\u2019S ENAMEL COMPLEXION POWDER.thority, &o., or whether merely the final sentence was to\tex cathedra.The discussion\tremained open even for\tof Papal Infallibility, and would, therefore remain open even if this dogma should be defined as an article of faith.Such definition wouldjform a strengthening argument for the first of the two opinions mentioned ; but it would not eo ipso raise that opinion into a Church doctrine.The view pronounced on the first Gallican Article would, as hitherto, remain tolerated as long as not expressly declared contrary to Church doctrine.\u201c Third question.\u2014Would the teachers of July 30.JOHN HOPE, \u2022Corn Exchange Buildings.180 THE SCOTTISH PROMUT IISTITUTM MUTUAL LIFE ASSURANCE.Accumulated Fund, £.1,500,000 Sterling.Subsistino assurances oyer Æfi.SLO.OCa Deposited in Canada, £100,000.HEAD OFFICE\u2014B St.Andrew Square, Edinburgh.CANADA OFFICE\u201455 St.Francois Xavier Street, Montreal,.In this Society alone members can assure with right to share in the \u2022 .dwie profits tor moderate Premiums.For payment of the same yearly sum as large an Asg,nranco may be generally secured from the first, as can be looked for elsewhere after mamy years accumu-1 ation of Business.Thus a Policy for £1200 or £1250, with right to Profits, may be had for the Premium usually charged by other offices for £1000 only Such an arrangement is bviously more suited for securing a Competent Family Provision; than that which by the same yearly outlay secures a smaller present Assurance, wit'n the hope only of prospective additions.For tables of rates, &e., apply at the Compan y\u2019s Office BOARD OF DIRECTORS IN MONTREAL ; ALEXANDER MITCHELL, Esq., Merchant.JOSEPH MAOKAY,Esq., Merchant JAMES FERRIER, Jr., Esq,, Merchant.DUNCAN COULSON, Esq., Manager Bank of Toronto, Montreal.SOLICITORS-Messrs.PERKINS & RAMSAY.Medical Officer\u2014ROBERT ORAIK, Esq., M.J).GENERAL MANAGERS: OSWAXD BROTHERS I1PÜRTMT J_0 TEACHERS.JUST PUBSISHEU: THE mi AM ATM) ItESJLDEK; A selection of pieces for practice in FBO-CUTICUN, with introductory hints in Reading*, By John Andrew, Instructor in Elocution at McGill College aiad Normal School, Montreal, PRICE 75 CENTS.This selection has been made with, special reference to the practical acquirement ofthe Art of Elocution.The pieces are mostly new and unhackneyed, and are mainly extracted from the best English Dramatists, as being likely to interest and amuse pupils, while the attention and precision required in reading Dramatic Compositions cause them to be best adapted for practice.DAWSON BROTHERS, Gt, St.James st., Montreal October 21.251 BLOATERS, ALEX.McGIBBON.251 October 4, (Commission Merchants and Stock Brokers.) Office-55 St.FR NCOIS XAVIER STREET, MONTREAL, PORTLAND Per Express.October Si.DftïlD ELGfflROD.By GEORG-E MAC DONTALD, Author of \u201cArmais of a Quiet Neighbourhood,\u201d \u201c The Seaboard Parish,\u201d \u201c Alec Forbes of Howglen,\u201d \u201cGuild Court,\u201d \u201cUnspoken Sermons.\u201d Just received and for sale by DAWSON BROS., 65 to 59 Great St, James Street.October 19,\t219 T-AKIE NOTICE.The Parties that have secured Building Lots in Guilbault\u2019s Garden will please call and sign the agreement ; and those that wish to secure First Rate Lots had better call soon, as there are very few left.The terms are very easy, the greater part of the money remaining in the hands of the purchaser, payable 2 years after my death, at 6 per cent.The Stock of ANIMALS and MUSEUM, BIRDS, &c., &c., will be Sold on tbe 'FIRST of NOVEMBER, or soon after.J.E.GUILBAULT.October 15.\t248 Intending purchasers can see the pian Y applying to J.E.G.IbTOTIOJÏL HUGH P.SPRUNT is no longer in on employ.JAS, O\u2019BRIEN & CO.October 21.\tr 251 THE SECRET OF BE A UTY.A new, elegant, and agreeable preparation tor beautifying tne Complexion and rendering it fresh, clear, pure, and Of marble delicacy, yet ENTir.ELY F it EE from anything which can possibly be injurious to the cuticle.it eradicates Tan, Discolorations, and other article, either liquid or powder, whether of foreign or home manufacture.At the sea-shore, where the skin is effected by the sun, it will prove invaluable ; and equally so in cold weatheri when the skin is liable to be chapped.It is soothing for children, and the nursery should never be without it.Bogle\u2019s Enamel Complexion POWDER must take first rank among cosmetics, and its effects be seen in the domestic circle, in society, and wherever eyes o ligh t and forms of beauty come to grace the scene.Price, 50 cents.Done up in two separate colours\u2014White and Roseate.Ho bright the tear in Beauty\u2019s eye, Love half regrets to kiss it dry ! So sweet the blush of bashfulness, E\u2019en pity scarce can wish it less.Proprietor,\tW.BOGLE, Boston.And for Sale by bis Agents everywhere.May 21.\tDSW 122 W.To.TJLIBIB, Importe» of \u2022 General Hardware & Plated Ware RODGER\u2019S CUTLERY, ïïoïi.@e IT « x-m i six in jo-s, WINDOW CORNICES, PICTURE RODS, &c.402 NOTRE ME STREET MONTREAL.October 15,\t215 Batchelor\u2019s Hair Dye.This splendid Hair Dye is the best in the world.The only true and perfect Dye\u2014 Harmless, Reliable, Instantaneous.Nodis-appointment.No ridiculous tints.Remedies the ill effects of bad dyes.Invigorates and leaves tbe Hair soft and beautiful black or brown.Sold by all Druggists ana Perfumers; and properly applied atBatchel or\u2019s Wig Factory, No.15 Bond Street, New ^riia.\tDW 84 HOLBOWAY'S OINTMENT AND PILLS.\u2014Piles.- Do not suppose that every form of this complaint is incurable.The worst hemorrhoidal eases are not beyond the reach of Hollovvay\u2019s Ointment.It gives tone to the relaxed integuments and acts as.a safe styptic in the bleeding type of the disorder.Not unfreqnently constipation is an accompaniment of the disease, and when this happens it should be relieved with small doses of Holloway\u2019s Pills.Sold by all Druggists.\trDSW 254 EOT BARLEY Received regularly from the Mills, AND FOR SAIiF BY ALLAN BOWMAN & CO.26, Foundling Street, August 21 nominations was to be considered and striven after as a perfect ideal ; that under certain historical circumstances several religious creeds may participate in the same public rights, is neither pronounced nor denied.It is the same with thesis 78.But if tire theses rejected by the Pope, as they lie before us, should be rejected by the Council, the dogmatic view of the relation ot the Church to the Slate would not be altered.The theses of the Syllabus arc condemned by very different degrees of censure, although these are \u201d specified, but are to be ascertained by a process.Thus, e.g., iugust 22.1851, so often quoted, has condemned sentences from tire works of the Turin Professor Nuitz, referring to the relation between State and Church, such as ;\u2014'\u2022 Propositiones et doctrinas respectivefalsas, temerarias, scandalosas, er-oneas, in Sanctum Sedetn injuriosas, ejusdem juribus derogantes, ecclesiae regimen et divinam ejus constitulionem subvertentes, schismaticas, haercticas .nec non et Canonum Concilii Tridsntini eversions! If, therefore, the thesis should be rejected, unchanged by the next General Council, they would only he rejected under the same degrees of censure, and not as entirely and completely heretical ; as at the Council of Constance, w'th the confirmation of Martin V., many theses of Wy-ciifie and Huss have only been designated as sentenliæ erroneæ, temerariæ, sediliosœ (Art.11 of the Bull \u2019Inter Canotas\u2019).Those theses whioli form their opposite counterparts would not, therefore, eo ipso, already be dogmas.\u201cAnd as so solemn a rejection of the theses of the Syllabus could not merely, as such, alter the relations of State and Church dogmatically, so also could a raising of the doctrine of the Papal Infallibility into a dogma, as such, not alter them, as shown in the reply to the second question.\u201c Yet, if they, directly as such, would not alter the relations of Church and State, they might do so possibly in their direct historical consequences, for one thing are dogmatic principles and another their practical execution under future historical cir cumstances.\u201c Second Question.\u2014In this presupposed case would the public teachers of dogmatic theology and ecclesiastical iarv consider themselves hound to assume the doctrine of the divinely-ordained sovereignty of the Pope over the Monarchs and Governments (he it as potestas directa, or indirecta in tem-poralia) as binding on the conscience of every Christian ?\u201c Assuming that the theses ofthe Syllabus in their present shape should be condemned by the Council, and the Infallibility of the Pope, speaking ex cathedra, he declared dogma, the teachers of dogmatic theology would not in immediate consequence be bound to teach the doctrines of the divinely-ordained sovereignty of the Pope over the Monarchs and Governments, either as potestas directa, or as potestas indirecta in tem-poralia, as binding upon the conscience.They would not he bound to do so from the simple reason that the said doctrine would form then, as it does now, a free theological opinion, and such a one cannot he laid down as binding on the conscience of every Christian, oven if it were proveable by scientific reasons of the most weighty and striking kind.The Syllabus, it is true, rejects the thesis (th.20,) ecclesia vim inferen- tam temporalem, directum vel indirectam; and the further thesis (25) preeter potestatem episcopatui in hœrenlem alia est attributa temporalis potestas a civili imperio vel expresse vet tacite conccssa, revocimda propterea, cum libuerit, a civili imperio.In a corresponding manner the Encyclical \u201c Quanta cura\u201d rejects the assertion : ecclesiam nihil debere decernere quod astringere possit fidelium con-scientias in ordine ad usum temporalium, ecclesiæ jus non competere violatores legum suarum panis temporahbus coercenda.In all these reference is made to the views of Nuitz\u2014viz., that the Church possesses no power, either directly or indirectly, stretching over things in visibility more especially that no purely ecclesiastical jurisdiclia pro foro externo belonged to the Bishops.This view only is repudiated, that it does not lie in the inmost Divme right ofthe Church to appear as the visible Church, and to make itself felt in the world of visibility, or to make a salutary use of the temporalia in binding upon the consciences of the believers, or to oblige them to temporal works of repentance and penances, &c.A clear boundary between the power of the State, to the domain of either of which, in their way, belong things temporal, is nowhere drawn here.More especially is it not stated that the direct or indirect power of the Church in spiritual things is to be extended to the deposition or the appointment of temporal authorities (Obrigkciten).\u201c And even if the infallibility ofthe ex cathedra speaking Pope should he defined as a dogma, this would not imply as in any way ecclesiastically binding the dogma, that according to the Divine law the Pope had an unlimited right over the secular monarchs and Governments.Whatever since Gregory VII.several Popes have decreed in tills respect, that also several Councils, considered (Ecumenical, have dc*' creed in like manner.The third Lateran Council of 1179 declared (De Ifoereticis, c.27) those subjects, whose worldly masters adhered to the errors of the Katharians, and chiefly of the Brabantians.and for such a time as they would adhere to them, releas-d from their duties.The 4th Lateran Council of 1215, ordained in the decree Jixcommunicamus (c.IZ, De Haeret., v.7,) that the condemned heretics should be handed over to Jthe worldly authorities and their officials for puaishmçnt, the Manor, if this latter himself does not offer any impediments, &c.In accordance with these principles, the 4th Lateran/ Council deposed Count Raymond of Tout louse as Protector of the Albingensians, am handed .over ids lands to Count Simon o Montfort.Pope Innocent deposed at tin first Council of Lyons Q urn fratribus nostri.et sancto concilia delibcratiohe praehabita) Frederick II., and released ids subjects of the oath of fidelity and the duty of obedience towards him as F.inpcror and as King, and pronounced tbe excommunicatio latae senlentiae over all who should support him ( Décréta le, ad aposlalicx Sess., c.2.De sent, et re jud II., 14.) Finally, the General Council of Trent decided in its Reform decrees (Sess.xxv.de ref., c.19) that tin Emperor, Kings, Dukes, Princes, Mark graves, Counts, and all secular powers who should allow any place to bo used for duelling between Christians, should be ex-1 communicated, and should lose the power bestowed upon them over the city, fortress, or place in or near which they have allowed the duel to be fought, that they should return to their lords, and the duellers and their seconders should be excommunicated, and all their goods proscribed.\u201c If the dogma of the Papal infallibility implied directly, a certainty, binding upon each Christian, ofthe Pope\u2019s porverto depose by Divine right Monarchs and Governments, and to release their subjects of the oath of fidelity and the duty of obedience, and to put other Monarchs and Governments in their stead, then it must have been, ever since the 3d and 4th Lateran Council, a doctrine binding upon consciences, whether as dogmatic (dogma fidei) or theological (proximam fidei), that the Church has a claim to a like right by Divine law.If, further, we were to assume that Gregory VII.and other Popes had pronounced a like Papal power over Monarchs and Governments, not merely as a Divine right, hut had uttered the resolutions in question ex cathedra, as, e.g., Gregory, in the Roman Synod of 1076, in a letter to Bishop Heri-man, in Metz (Hard., VI., p.1,4, 1469-1473), in the letter of May 8, 1080, to William the Conqueror (Hard., ibid., p.1447), Urban II.(c.5, C.XV., p.9-6), Lucius III.(c.9, de.Hœret, V.7), Innocent III.in the Decretals \u201c Solitæ\u201d (c.6, de maj.et obed.i., 33), \u201cVenerabilem\u201d (c.34, de elect.,!., 6), \u2018Novit\u2019 (c.13, degudic., ii., 1), 1 Vergentes\u2019 (c.10, de hceret., v., 7), Honorius III.[e.13, de pœnit, v., 37]; Gregory IX., in his letter to the patriarch Germanus of May 18, 1233, in the letter to Frederick II.of October 23, 1236 [and c.16, de hceret., v., 7], or Paul IV., in the Bull ; Cum et aposto-latus of 1558 [Lib.sept., c.9, de hceret.et schism., v., 3] : Pius V., in the Bull Inter multipliées [c.10, ibid.]\u2014then it must logically be assumed that tire above Ecumenical Councils have pronounced such right of the Church over monarchs and governments, not merely as a Divine right, but the decrees to be generally binding, he it as de fidei, or merely theologically, formulas in both being nearly identical.\u201c And yet it is a historical fact that, notwithstanding the decisions of the 3d and 4th Lateran Councils, in spite ofthe assumption of their cecumenical character, and of the-further assumption that those decisions of tlio Pope have not merely been pronounced at the Council, but with its assent, and in spite of the decision of Trent, two opposite theories prevail within the ecclesiastical world and ecclesiastical theology, one which ascribes to the Church a divinely-ordained sovereignty over monarchs and governments, whether direct or indirect, the other denies such a right, without being amenable to ecclesiastical censure.True, weighty theologians have designated this latter theory, which found utterances in the first Gallican Article, as ; sententia hseretica htercsi proxima, en onea, temeraria, schismalica impia,\u2019 &c.; but such are private censures,not ecclesiastical ones such as would be authori-t .lively binding to outer or inner obedience, or, least oi all, to inner consent.True, Innocent XI., in a Breve of April 11, 1682, and Alexander VIII., in the Constitution InUr multipliées, of August 4, 1690, have de-clai ed null the Articles of the Gallican declaration of 1682.True, Pius VI., in the Bull Auciorem Fidei of the year 1794, has declared them, on their being renewed by the Diocesan Synod of Pistoja, as 1 teme-rarios,\u2019 1 scandalosas\u2019 and 1 injurias\u2019 to the Apostolic Chair, because that Article had been included in a decree of faith and made the subject of public and solemn confession, &c.But it cannot be affirmed that this first Gallican Article, the relation of Church and State and a mode of interpretation in the sense of those General Councils, falls under this censure, and would, in case of being detended and maintained scientifically, carry excommunication.This cannot he affirmed, because the history of ecclesiastical theology ever since 1794 could not be well made to harmonize with it.\u201c The first of the above theories was almost exclusively predominant in the Middle Ages ; the second has spread since the 17th century in France and other Catholic countries, among Church theologians.They both agree in this\u2014that the Church has the right, even the duty, to examine everything by the criterion of Christian revelation, to deliver dogmatic and disciplinarian judgments, more especially to draw within the domain of these State laws and State actions, to prohibit them in case of their running counter to science, and even to proceed to penal ecclesiastical censures against tire secular regents placed under its jurisdiction.The two theories only disagree in this \u2014whether the Church, by virtue of Divine right, has the power of deposing and installing worldly regents or not ; whether the named Ecumenical Councils may issue their decisions on these points by Divine right, or, under the historical circumstances of the period, merely by human law, especially \u2022 the law of custom ; whether the decisions are to be interpreted according to the one or the other of these vinwa, wKotn, they are to be taken as decisions from these authorities in their leading capacity, or as disciplinary decisions casually supplemented by doctrinal reasons ; whether in the first case they are to be taken as infallible doctrinal decisions, and in that case, whether as dogmatico-ecclesiastical, or merely as theologico-ccclesiastical decisions.\u201c Both theories were mostly agreed\u2014that the Church may release from an oath in favour of a third person, or received by him without the consent of this third person; and that it could also release from the duty of obedience ; hut the question between the two was\u2014whether this right did not find its limits in the Divine right of the State, or whether it did find such limits for tire sake of tire public good, whether the oath of subjects may be dissolved or not by virtue of it, whether an active resistance against temporal authorities might ever be commanded by virtue ot it, or merely a passive resistance against arbitrary laws against conscience According to the different manner in which the decisions of the two Lateran Councils Lyons and Trent, had been interpreted,\u2014 and this applies also to similar decrees of the Council of Constance or Basle, which threatened in cases of disobedience no; merely princes of the Church but secular princes with the loss of all their dignities and offices ;\u2014in the same different manners the Papal decisions have been interpreted by different schools.Thus more especially the Bull Unam sanctum of Boniface VIII.(extr.com.c.I.de maj.et obed., I., 8.) It concludes with the words, \u2019porro subesse Romano Pontijici omnem humanavi creaturam (omni humanae creaturae 1) declaramus, dicimus, definimus, pronuntiamus, omnino esse de necessitate sa-lutis.\u201d As it not simply declares and teaches such subjection to tire Pope as tire representative #f Christ, but ordains it, -on condition of salvation, as a thing of faith, it has always been considered a dogmatic Bull, and the decision as an ex cathedra utterance.Like the Bull Meruit of Clement V., it found an express confirmation bj' the fifth Lateran Council, in Leo X.\u2019s Bull Pastor seternus (Lib.sept.c.i., de Voneil, iii., 7).But the point was whether only the last sentence or also the preceding ones were to be defined as ex cathedra, especially those which bestow upon the ecclesiastical ower the right t