The Quebec gazette = La gazette de Québec, 23 juin 1828, lundi 23 juin 1828

[" br.e du (I Uvent reçus x prêt > bai ort de vu ses sprur euter odités ter; A su.ndent nt de 1.103 eaux, fom.M près Fron.me, à 7 fn capa- r Pent Mire.ues, qua- ngs Wise ai doi.sous re Les les of.1 cis e ire, Ps a D, est K à i pts à tagrier, DE, DE.UT.83 h, \u20ac 4 mo- ol cot TE NIX en pene lu feu, poucer lent « > dans ns ters bes, 2 x pour ur Js pris 4 à sasue is ull 0 Fin EC, ement praires pou de ar, stairé.ad aged ry 08 Foch pet pret er the ices 10 N, fe f law Jaurs claims | thee with | R.- oii Eur eduste rendet AN.RS TE e\u2014 pa ay SECT NK.-DIRECTOR for the WEEK, QU BA KoA Discoun NDAY K TIURSDAY MON N Dar os for Discount should be encicsed tothe Cashier 0 8 the dav of discount, dre Le business at the Bunk, from 9 A.M, to sh M NOAH_FREER.Curbier.SANK OF MONTREA L,\u2014Office of Discount Bi Deposit Director for the present Week, ant B41 Wat WALKER, Eq.; ount TUESDAY and FRIDAY.Discount should be enclosed to the Cashier the day of discount.\u2014Office hours From 10 Daye of Disc Notes offered for and given in before A ier Sire A.SIMPSON, Caer.= VUEREC FIRE OFFICE Director for the week Q Honble.A.W.COCH RAN.HOUSE OF COMMONS, Tusspay, Mar 6.\u201cGo pres titton fi certain Wi ose to present 8 petitlon from ai Mr wilmo( Patrie Canada, as we understood, respecting and in dving which he said he wished to take the pre.rants rtunity of addressing to the Housea few words of expla- ent orp ich an it relnted to a matter purely personal, he should mane nd to compress within as narrow & compass AS possible, fre poh ard that some of the observations which he let fallon a He hee whol when speaking of the Union Bill of 1822, were eed to refer to Mr.Ellice, the late member for Coventry, in wr considered to be disrespectful towards that gentleman.t Sati no language of his could, with truth or justice, be sup.Certair * fer to Mr.Ellive\u2014at least, of thix he felt perfectly sa.cé har nothing of the strong language into which, during the tof th of debate, he might have been betrayed, was intended to boat the slightest allusion to the character or conduct of Mr.Ellice.; by the Right e h.\u2014As the explanation given by the e Sr Le had reference to an occasion, in which he (Sir How was somewhat concerned, he wished to know } intosh} ! Ls \u201che airong language in question was applied to him or to n.: snp other Porton could assure the Right Hon.Gentleman op- inti , that no language of his was at any time or rote, very def towards him (Sir J.M ackintosh » nd [ (continued the light Hon.Member) went tv him on the : sion referred to, and told hin that if he chose 1 was perfectly win, atthe moment to qualify what I had said.My opinion i has bern that this Tlouse is not the place fur strong lan.rn lear, ear.) 1f orcasions arise demanding such, there urge, (ot opportunities out of doors, without uceupying the we tion of this House in a manner so unprofitable, However, ee it has been sapposed that language of mine bore upon the aractet and conduct of Hon.Members in a manner quite op- fe Queher Gisette.MONDAY, 23rd JUNE 1848, .real intentions, 1 feel called upon to enter Mn Ot more detailed explanation than would under dif ferent circamstancen be at all necessars.and before entering on ! i | feel it due, in justice 10 the Right Hon.Gentleman opposste, ; 10 duclare my present conviction, that ave of the phrases used ly me on that occasion was quite Inapnosite-l mesn in the allusion | made to the Union Bill.What I camplained of was this, that 1 had Full reason to supnose that the Right Hon, Gentleman op- pwite woukt have piven his support to the Union Dil.Now, that support coming from hin as a constitutional lawyer, and an independent member of this House, was of considerable value ; and | reckoned upon it accordingly.Up 10 the very hour at which it wag brought forward | had every reason to helieve he would havesupported the Bill.My proposition is this, that up to the very hour at which he stood forward to cast censure upon those tre whom the Bill was introduced, he had given us reason to suppose that we should have the advantage of his support, It was of this that 1 comnphined\u2014it was under this impression that 1 al! slong laboured.Now, if the fact turn out to be that he admits that there were some grounds for this persuasion on ny part, then, of couree, Ÿ can have eothing to explain or qualify.Ii turn out that | am in error, I shall he most happy to scknowledge ny nisskemore than a misapprehension it cannot be in any quarier, .2, Sir J Mackintosh uttered a few pentences in a tone quite inaudible in the gallery, and then procecded :\u2014-Un the occasion to which the Kighe Hon.Gentleman refers, I mean on Friday night, 1 confers 1 did not hear from hin a single expression of\u201d the harch nature which has been attributed, and whieh is\u201d well known to be so inconsistent with his usual manner.It so happened that I did not hear them, from what cause iv not now material.On that very oucaston the Right Jon.Gentleman came to me and offered to make the qualifications of which he has spoken; and J, smiling, observed that it was perfect\u2019y needless, thinking he merely referred to the general explanation given on these occasions, namely, that he was besraved into the Innguage he had u à 4 indication of its announe.ment being near at hand, thvie were | temporary repeal.eee Sn the Administration Press will have it that Mr.Huskisson® \u2018This is one way of aiding the King\u2019 ; authority and good name, by crying down the good opinion en- ; We have very serious objection to the same press We say \"that Mr.Huskisson's answer for the King is both gracious and sa.tisfactorv, and yet Mr.Huskisson\u2019s speech is unsatisfactory, par- ; setting i*self up as a judge of what is